As classes wrap up, I've been beginning to realize how much I'm going to miss all of my first semester classes and the friends I've made in each of them. I know I'm definitely going to miss having a class where I can discuss Disney movies every meeting. No matter how interesting any class is in the rest of my time at Duke, it'll be hard for it to be as much fun as talking about Disney. Going into finals week, I thought I'd post some Disney-themed encouragement for everyone. Good luck and thanks for making this semester so great!
Decoding Disney
Sunday, December 8, 2013
Thursday, November 21, 2013
Race in Disney and Grey's
In
her article on the portrayal of race in The
Princess and the Frog, Sarah Turner argues that Disney employs a message of
colorblindness in its characterization of Tiana and Naveen. Although she is
shown as black, Tiana must also be “simply another princess” in order to avoid
characterizing Tiana in stereotypical African American ways (84). Turner claims
that in order for Disney’s message of race to be effective, the audience must
both notice her blackness while simultaneously overlooking it “in favor of her
character and her desire to access the American dream” (84). I think this
approach is a wise and effective one; Disney was smart to make Tiana’s race a
relative non-factor in the debut of the first African American princess. After
all, the point is that her attitude and personality should outweigh any
physical characteristics, so I don’t see a problem.
This article also
led me to think about other movies or shows that depict race in ways that make
it unimportant, and one of the most salient examples that came to mind was
ABC’s Grey’s Anatomy. In the show,
the main characters range greatly in race and ethnicity, featuring several
“typical white” characters alongside African American, Asian, and Hispanic
doctors. The diversity in the show had honestly never occurred to me until I
watched a recorded interview on the subject, and I think that’s what creator
Shondra Rhimes intended. The underlying message that race is irrelevant to
one’s abilities or potential is one that I think should be much more prevalent
than it currently is in modern film and other media. In the interview I watched
(which is in a link below, but isn’t solely focused on race and diversity),
Sandra Oh, the actress who plays Christina Yang, mentions that she auditioned
for the role of “Christina” and that the “Yang” last name was added on after
she was cast. This struck me as an incredibly impressive thing for a writer to
do; how can someone write a role in such a way that race is a non-factor and be
completely open to allowing an actress of any race to play the role?
Shonda Rhimes, who is African American, has spoken many
times about her casting choices, and sums up her approach to casting racially
diverse actors and actresses in an interview with the New York Times. Her
interview is pretty long, but relevant and insightful, especially when one
considers the perspective it is coming from. Here is a brief except from the
article:
Rhimes
refuses to make an issue of her casting. “I think it’s sad, and weird, and
strange that it’s still a thing,” she told me over the phone a few months ago.
“It’s 2013. Somebody else needs to get their act together. And, oh, by the way,
it works. Ratings-wise, it works.” In addition to its general success,
“Scandal” is also rated No. 1 on network TV among African-American viewers.
While race on Rhimes’s shows is omnipresent, it is not
often discussed explicitly. This has led to a second-order critique of her
shows: that they are colorblind, diverse in a superficial way, with the
characters’ races rarely informing their choices or conversations. Rhimes,
obviously, disagrees. “When people who aren’t of color create a show and they
have one character of color on their show, that character spends all their time
talking about the world as ‘I’m a black man blah, blah, blah,’ ” she says.
“That’s not how the world works. I’m a black woman every day, and I’m not
confused about that. I’m not worried about that. I don’t need to have a
discussion with you about how I feel as a black woman, because I don’t feel
disempowered as a black woman.”
Shonda Rhimes is definitely
heading in the right direction as far as diversifying American media, and it’s
nice to see that Disney is starting to do the same.
Link to Shonda’s interview
with Times:
Link to Sandra Oh’s
interview:
Friday, November 15, 2013
The Vittetoe family goes diving in Disney (without me!)
As
some of you may know, despite my love for Disney, I’ve never actually been to
Disney World. My sister and I used to give my parents a hard time about our
never making a trip to the magical land that all our friends revered, but last
week my family (without me!) got to make the most amazing Disney World trip
I’ve ever heard of. In order to fully explain the trip, I need to give a little
background info.
My
family’s favorite thing to do together is scuba dive, and over the years it’s
become much more than just a hobby. My parents met through scuba diving almost
25 years ago, so it’s pretty safe to say that our family is founded on scuba
diving. Ever since I turned 12 and became old enough to get my diving
certification it’s been an adventure that we all share a love for and can do
together. In 2009 my parents started a small scuba diving shop called Tank
Worx. For the
past two years my parents have gone to a conference called DEMA (Dive Equipment and Marketing Association) to
look at scuba gear they might want to put in the shop. This year the conference
was held in Orlando and my sister got to go with them as a “consultant” (that’s
what the business cards she made for herself say anyway).
Now
we get to the exciting part of the trip. My parents, sister, and their diving
friends who made the trip with them got to scuba dive in the shark tank in
Epcot! They got to use the gear that the animal trainers and other underwater
workers use and spent 45 minutes in the tank with manta rays, sharks, and a
bunch of other saltwater fish. At first they just swam around the front part of
the tank where there weren’t too many fish and waved at the people watching
through the glass. Then after about 15 minutes they were led to a part further
back in the tank and kneeled down on the sand. Almost immediately they were
greeted by hammerhead, nurse, and sand sharks. The sharks swam right by the
group of divers, coming within a foot of my sister’s head! She said she was
terrified at first but after a couple of minutes all she could think about was
how incredible it was to be so close to such amazing animals. After their dive
they were free to roam around the park until it closed (for free!). Hearing the
stories about my family’s first Disney trip made me unbelievably jealous,
especially because it was such a unique way to visit Disney for the first time.
The good news is the conference is being held in Orlando again in 2015, so that
gives me two years to convince my parents to bring me with them next time. Here
are some pictures and what my sister said about the trip!
Karly says:
It was absolutely a once in a life time experience. Diving in the Living Seas Exhibit in EPCOT was such a special moment in my life because millions of people see this exhibit, but very few see it from the other side of the glass as I had the opportunity to. My favorite part of my Dive Quest in the Living Seas Exhibit in EPCOT was the communication with the children on the other side of the glass. Blowing everyone bubble rings, waving to people as they sat to enjoy their supper, and taking pictures with the kids were just a few of the events special to me.
Monday, November 11, 2013
Disney's "Second Screen Live" – one screen too many?
Now that it’s
November, my grandparents have already started e-mailing and calling my cousins
and me, asking what’s on our Christmas lists this year. Of course I haven’t
even begun to start thinking this far in advance, so I always promise I’ll
think about it, make a list, and send it to them “really soon.” My oldest
cousin, Michelle, has consistently been on the top of her game, though. She
starts her list in September and is always incredibly thorough, waiting for the
November call from our grandparents where she inevitably becomes the favorite
grandchild for being so prepared. This October, Michelle’s new baby Deklyn just
turned one, so the majority of the items on her list are for Deklyn. This year,
one of the items at the top of her list is an iPad for baby Deklyn to play
games on. She explained to me that there are tons of games intended for very young
kids to play that help with their motor skills and can even help them learn to
read earlier. I’m sure I’ve heard of this before, but the idea of my baby
cousin playing on an iPad seems crazy to me.
This reminded me of
the article we read a few months ago, “Disney's 'Little Mermaid Second Screen
Live' adds iPad twist,” which describes the latest innovation in movie-going.
Movie viewers (specifically young children) are encouraged to download a
particular app and bring their iPad with them to see a movie, during which they
can play games and sing along with the story on the screen. The article claims that Disney sees this new
sort of iPad initiative as a way to lure in a young audience who would be
attracted by the idea of being able to interact with the movie. While I think
the idea of somehow “interacting” with a classic Disney movie seems exciting,
I’m more concerned about what this type of entertainment could be doing to the
youngest generation. Why is it no longer enough to simply go to a movie for the
sake of watching the movie? Have we
really become so attached to and dependent on our electronic devices that we
can’t survive two hours in a theater without them? I agree that we are rapidly
progressing towards a more technological era and that we should embrace the
opportunities technology can provide, but certain things, especially classic
Disney movies, should maintain some degree of inviolability.
Unfortunately, I can’t test out this new
form of entertainment myself, at least until it comes to a theater closer to
me. If you want to see for yourself what “Second Screen Live” is really all
about, here is a link to a preview, list of participating theaters, and easy
way to download the app you’ll need for the event.
If anyone ends up trying out one of these
movies over the next few breaks (if you happen to be in CA, NY, or NJ), I’d
love to hear what you thought!
Sunday, November 10, 2013
The Princess and the Frog (and their races)
Ajay
Gehlawat’s article on the “elision of race” in Disney’s The Princess and the Frog initially seemed like it was heading in a
direction I could understand and might potentially agree with. The abstract
talks mostly about the “dual contexts” of the movie’s New Orleans setting and
21st century America release, which I agree is crucial in any
interpretation or critique of the movie. I was also interested in his idea
about how Disney deals with race by essentially avoiding it through the
transformation of the two protagonists (both of whom are ‘brown’) into frogs.
Despite my initial thoughts about Gehlawat’s article, it pretty much went
downhill for me after the abstract. Many of his arguments and evidence are
tenuous and questionable, and it almost seems like his use of flowery and
sometimes pretentious language serves to mask this weakness in substance.
In
his paragraph about the “conflation of blackness with bestiality” (a pretty
ridiculous argument to begin with) Gehlawat uses cloudy language that makes his
point impossible to understand. It’s as if he hopes the use of big words will
lure his audience into simply assuming his argument is worth believing since he
is capable of using such vocabulary (he has a PhD so he is obviously very
intelligent but it also seems like he’s pretty good at using a thesaurus). For
example, his topic sentence reads, “The regressive form, then, belies the
salutary content, even as, again, it is the conflation of the two that makes
the film so laudatory, i.e., the first animated black princess.” There are way
too many commas and impossibly large words for me to even make sense of what
his argument might be, making this sentence essentially useless to me, no
matter what idea he is attempting to get across to his audience.
Underneath
the unnecessarily complicated vocabulary and syntax, many of Gehlawat’s arguments
are simply absurd and not really supported by any kind of substantial evidence.
For instance, he argues that the restaurant in which Tiana works, Duke’s CafĂ©,
is a reference to David Duke, a white nationalist and member of the KKK. While
I applaud his historical knowledge, there is absolutely no proof that this
connection is what the animators intended, and to say so is ridiculous. I feel
like I could just as easily argue that the restaurant’s name is a reference to
Duke University and its racially diverse population, which would imply a
meaning entirely opposite from what Gehlawat suggests. I also feel like a lot
of the questions he poses as to the exact political inner workings of the
movie’s plot are unwarranted. No Disney movie ever explains what the “happily
ever after” truly entails, nor do they explain the exact basis or process
through which the couple are wed. To expect this particular movie to do so
seems both unfair and even a little silly. It makes me wonder if he’s seen any
other Disney movie ever made; there are always
holes in the plot, but the movies are made for kids so it really doesn’t
matter.
Basically
I just feel like Gehlawat is trying way too hard to tear into the movie to
prove that it portrays race inaccurately or unfairly. I actually can’t really
say for sure what he was trying to prove because his language made it really
difficult to understand what he was trying to say, but whatever his argument
was, he didn’t convince me. In spite of this, there was one part of his article
that I agreed with. He quotes Anika Noni Rose, the actress who voices Tiana,
when she says, “I really hope we get to a point where Black characters in
mainstream roles is not something we think about.” Even though these aren’t
actually Gehlawat’s words, I give him credit for at least showing this side of
the argument, even though it comes at the very end of his article. It should be
a goal to reach a point where having a black protagonist isn’t the huge deal
that it’s made into now, but rather just an element of the story. Race will
always play a role, but it should never steal the show.
Monday, October 28, 2013
Quasi-thoughts on Quasimodo
Norden’s
article on the portrayal of disabilities in Disney’s The Hunchback of Notre Dame discusses Quasimodo’s characterization
as disabled and how his appearance adversely impacts his ability to function
normally in society. In conjunction with disability studies, Norden claims that
Disney “uses Quasimodo’s physicality to imply that he is emotionally stunted”
(Norden, 168). While I understand the idea that Quasi appears to be socially
stunted and immature for his supposed age, I do not agree that Quasimodo’s
physical appearance is the reason for his being so, nor do I think this is the
message Disney intended.
As
Norden discusses, making the original story suitable for an animated Disney
film was a challenge, and filmmakers were faced with the task of making the
characters more relatable for young children. As a result of this demand, I
believe the creators of the movie purposely made Quasi more childlike in his
obedience, imagination, and fondness for playing with figurines in order to
make the main character someone that kids could relate to. Quasi’s youthful
tendencies are a product of an attempt to make him into a character children
can understand, not a product of filmmakers’ desires to equate physical
deformity with emotional underdevelopment.
Additionally,
it is much more reasonable that Quasimodo’s being socially or emotionally
stunted is a product of his being trapped in Notre Dame for his entire life
instead of simply a product of his deformity. It would be much easier for me to
accept the argument that his underdevelopment is a result of the oppressive,
discriminatory religion Frollo exhibits. After all, it is not Quasi’s physical
deformity that keeps him trapped in the tower, but rather Frollo’s inability to
accept Quasi and his handicap.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)