Norden’s
article on the portrayal of disabilities in Disney’s The Hunchback of Notre Dame discusses Quasimodo’s characterization
as disabled and how his appearance adversely impacts his ability to function
normally in society. In conjunction with disability studies, Norden claims that
Disney “uses Quasimodo’s physicality to imply that he is emotionally stunted”
(Norden, 168). While I understand the idea that Quasi appears to be socially
stunted and immature for his supposed age, I do not agree that Quasimodo’s
physical appearance is the reason for his being so, nor do I think this is the
message Disney intended.
As
Norden discusses, making the original story suitable for an animated Disney
film was a challenge, and filmmakers were faced with the task of making the
characters more relatable for young children. As a result of this demand, I
believe the creators of the movie purposely made Quasi more childlike in his
obedience, imagination, and fondness for playing with figurines in order to
make the main character someone that kids could relate to. Quasi’s youthful
tendencies are a product of an attempt to make him into a character children
can understand, not a product of filmmakers’ desires to equate physical
deformity with emotional underdevelopment.
Additionally,
it is much more reasonable that Quasimodo’s being socially or emotionally
stunted is a product of his being trapped in Notre Dame for his entire life
instead of simply a product of his deformity. It would be much easier for me to
accept the argument that his underdevelopment is a result of the oppressive,
discriminatory religion Frollo exhibits. After all, it is not Quasi’s physical
deformity that keeps him trapped in the tower, but rather Frollo’s inability to
accept Quasi and his handicap.